Commonwealth Court affirms wedding barn ruling


Richard Wimer and Jody have no longer misplaced faith in their plans to create a wedding barn/reception facility in Wilmington Township.
They got some encouragement Wednesday whilst Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court upheld a ruling by using Lawrence County Common Pleas Court Judge John W. Hodge that a Wilmington Township zoning ordinance prohibiting the Wimers’ plans is invalid.
Nonetheless, Richard Wimer said the couple is not quite geared up to start taking bookings.
“Even while this is throughout and the dust has settled, it will take us at the least one year to get the constructing in form to open,” he stated.
In addition, lawyer James Manolis, who represented the Wimers of their “3-years-and-counting” saga to open a wedding barn business at 3538 State Route 956, said the Wilmington Township supervisors may also opt to attraction.
“I trust they have got 30 days to petition the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to ask if they will hear an appeal,” he said. “The Wimers will must wait and see what happens subsequent.”
The Wimers’ odyssey started out in February 2017, after they were running a catering enterprise and running the unique events venue, Rustic Acres Farm in Volant. They desired to open a marriage barn enterprise in Wilmington Township, and in June 2018, they bought their dream location, the 31.4-acre Willow Brook Farm on Route 956. The supposed to make investments $2.2 million to renovate the barn to host weddings and receptions.
Their plans have been delayed when the township supervisors amended the municipality’s zoning ordinance, which previously had made no point out of the sort of commercial enterprise the Wimers proposed. The exchange mounted what the Wimers taken into consideration to be unreasonable conditions that confined events to 12 in keeping with calendar yr and the number of guests at each occasion to three hundred.
In July 2017, the Wimers challenged the zoning ordinance and proposed a much less-restrictive change that could allow the commercial enterprise to perform. The inspiration might have allowed an unlimited quantity of activities, whilst proscribing attendance at every to 300 visitors.
When this turned into denied by the supervisors, the Wimers — as Wimer Realty LLC, Wimer Holdings Corp and as themselves — filed a land use attraction in Common Pleas Court in September 2017.
In April 2018, Hodge dominated of their desire, rejecting the township’s motions and noting that the amended ordinance didn’t appropriately offer to be used as a unique occasion venue.
In his ruling, Hodge stated the township’s decision to disclaim the Wimers’ zoning ordinance become no longer justified; that the township failed to show that the Wimers’ use in their belongings would negatively have an effect on the general public health, safety and welfare; and that the Wimers’ task ought to have been granted with the aid of the supervisors. He additionally stated the township supervisors failed to correctly keep in mind evidence presented during the September 2017 listening to; that the Wimers’ challenge to the ordinance must had been sustained; that the vote of the supervisors become an abuse of discretion; and that the Wimers’ proposed use should have been accredited.
In so ruling, Hodge denied the supervisors’ motions to strike the land use appeal, to brush aside it as moot.
Hodge made the ruling on April thirteen, 2018. It changed into appealed to Commonwealth Court by way of the supervisors.
In a courtroom record filed Wednesday, the Commonwealth Court affirmed Hodge’s ruling, pronouncing he did not err in finding that the zoning ordinance became unconstitutional in that it absolutely excluded the use of wedding barns within the municipality, despite the fact that another entity turned into running a comparable business after acquiring a unique exception. Nor did the appellate courtroom consider the trial court docket erred in figuring out the matter changed into now not moot. The courtroom additionally stated the township did not “show a giant courting between the exclusion and the public health, protection, morality or standard welfare.”


Commonwealth Court affirms wedding barn ruling 1
Rick Wimer said neighborhood people he has met “have given us, not anything but wonderful reactions to our proposed commercial enterprise plans.”
“We live inside the residence and like the network,” he said. “We plan to move in advance with our plans.”
Three years in the past, earlier than he bought the belongings, he said, he visited the township workplace and met some of the supervisors who had been there.
“I instructed them of our plans and stated, ‘Before I move beforehand, tell me if anyone in your community could not be in desire of this, and I’ll move on.’ Both said it turned into a great idea and something that the township needed. Since then, things changed. I’ve spent three years and $85,000 in legal professionals’ expenses to resolve legal troubles.”It’s been not very pleasant. However, I wish to get this resolved soon. We’re nonetheless committed to the undertaking and the community.”