Beware the shag – why the famous fashion induced me years of hair trauma


The shag is back. The haircut is now not the pastime (although given the worldwide “sex “recession,” tha” wouldn’t be such a horrific component, both). Shag hair – long layers that frame the face and tumble down the neck, a thick fringe to disappear at the back of – has lengthy been a diffused marker of feminine insurrection. This fashion doesn’t require blowdrying, spraying, moussing, or straightening. It is the predecessor to the chiseled punk cuts of the overdue 70s, earlier than the pomp and fluff of an 80s perm. It is windswept, danced-in, slept on. Rumours-generation Stevie Nicks, Anita Pallenberg within the 70s, put up teenager-idol Marianne Faithfull finding herself on the album Broken English. The shag’shag’s muse is Natasha Lyonne in the Netflix drama Russian Doll, in which she plays the curt, cursing, chain-smoking PC video games programmer Nadia, trapped in a time loop at her 36th birthday party. Her shag is purple and wild, her persona similar. This isn’t what a bob, bun, or beehive would do.

famous fashion
But to anybody thinking about the shag, heed this cautionary tale. I had one in the mid-00s, a wild time for hair after an unforgivable Karen O bowl reduction. I lived with someone who washed her asymmetrical bob with organic washing powder so she could transfer from Lolita blond to emo black weekly. Electro-indie had loads to reply for. I spent three happy years with my shag. In terms of maintenance, a perimeter is a time dedication comparable to getting a puppy – however, in any other case, it became wash-and-put-on.

But then, sooner or later, in 2007, I went to the hairdresser’s “a tr.” My “hairdresser had known me as ill. Sandra will look when you, they said. I observed Sandra had wonkily implemented her lipstick; some became smudged on her chin. Would she be this slapdash with my hair? Yes, it grew to become out, she could. I’d waded in with a shag; I left with a mullet. And no longer an uneven Patti Smith or Chrissie Hynde does. I looked like Pat Sharp. “You “ught to just dye it crimson,” she” gagged my housemate, rising from the bathroom smelling like she’dshe’d been on a spin cycle. Regretfully, it didn’t take me half a decade to grow it out.

So if you are going to do a shag, make sure you have an excellent hairdresser. I’ve I’veormed it secure with my hair because of that then, but maybe it’s to deliver my antique shag returned. But Sandra, in case you positioned those scissors down.

We made a choice…

… and we need to inform you about it. We made a preference, which means that our journalism now reaches report numbers worldwide, and more than a million people have supported our reporting. We continue to face financial challenges, but we no longer place up a paywall compared to many news organizations. We need our journalism to stay available to all, irrespective of where they stay or what they could create the money for.

This is The GuardGuardian’s for open, impartial journalism: to be had for all people, funded by our readers. We depend upon contributions from our readers. Will you support our choice?

ReadeReaders powers our paintings, safeguarding our essential editorial independence. In this manner, the obligation of shielding impartial journalism is shared, enabling us to feel empowered to bring about global exchange. Your help offers Guardian Newshounds the time, space, and freedom to report with tenacity and rigor, to shed light wherein others receive us to challenge authority and query the fame quo. By keeping our journalism free and open to all, we can foster inclusivity and range, space for debate, and inspire communication. So, extra humans have gthe right to access accurate facts with integrity.

Guardian journalism is rooted in facts with a modern perspective on the arena. We are editorially impartial, meaning we set our very own agenda. Our journalism is loose from commercial bias and not motivated by billionaire owners, politicians, or shareholders. No one steers our opinion. While there are so few resources of facts you can trust, that is critical because it permits us to give a voice to those much less heard, challenges the effectiveness, and keeps them to account. With your support approach, we can keep investigating and exploring our time’s vital troubles.

Our model permits people to support us in a way that works for them. Every time a reader like you contributes to The Guardian, regardless of how massive or small, it goes at once into investment in our journalism. But we need to construct this guide for the years ahead.